Returns worth
looking beyond.

Same dates. Different investment mechanics.

This is a return leaderboard of five selected records, not a best-investment rating or a whole-market survey. Records were selected for public monthly history spanning the comparison window and coverage of the four routes. Selection is not random and can suffer survivorship bias. A higher return can come from greater leverage, different currencies, assets or risk. There is no risk-adjusted score or suitability recommendation.

¹ A consistent drawdown column

For each record, we start an index at 100 on 31 October 2025, compound the next twelve monthly observations and measure the largest fall from an earlier month-end peak within that window. Formula: 100 × (1 − current index ÷ highest earlier index). Initial capital is included as a peak. This is a month-end growth-index drawdown: it can be far smaller than real equity drawdown because it misses open losses and moves between month ends. It does not include a peak before the window.

In particular, NoPain’s 0.00% means every observed monthly result was positive. The source’s 20.63% full-history equity drawdown makes clear why that is not a claim of zero risk. Full-history source equity figures and CEW’s reconstructed daily NAV drawdown appear in the record notes, with their different periods and definitions.

² Fees are visible, not silently estimated away

DARWIN returns are gross before management and performance fees. MQL5 returns describe the provider account before the subscriber’s fixed charges, VPS and execution differences. CEW’s official NAV total return reflects fund expenses, but excludes investor dealing costs and tax. These are not common-basis, after-all-fees investor returns. Current prices were checked on 9 November 2026 and are not a verified historical fee schedule. We do not deduct a made-up annual fee estimate and call it an observed net result.

Calculation and currency

For the four strategy accounts, 12-month growth is 100 × [∏(1 + monthly growth ÷ 100) − 1], using the twelve displayed source values. Those rounded observations can differ slightly from a provider’s unrounded calculation. No annual forecasts or lifetime growth figures enter the ranking. CEW uses its official one-year NAV total return, with its drawdown separately reconstructed from issuer NAV history and the ex-date distribution; a 0.01-percentage-point return reconciliation difference remains disclosed. Account percentages remain in their original reporting basis and have not been translated into one common investor currency.

What is excluded

XXX2026 and Don2026 lacked a complete 12-month history. QImpulse_ValuT had blank months and an excluded-history notice, so we did not turn blanks into assumed zero returns. RAZOR EA had a longer imported history but monitoring began in January 2026, after the window started. HXA showed a flat, inactive-looking period; it was not used as an active opportunity example. No Mint research backtest is presented as a live investor return.

The underlying pages are public provider/platform records, not audited statements or independent verification of withdrawals, account authenticity, investor results, legal permissions or future availability. Past performance can change, is not a forecast and does not guarantee future results.

Download the calculation data (JSON) ↓ · Download the leaderboard (CSV) ↓

Frozen launch snapshot, checked 9 November 2026. No automatic weekly refresh is running. Each future edition needs refreshed records, a new common window and source checks.